OpenSees Retractions

Citation cartels, peer-review rings, paper mills, and other schemes have eroded the integrity of scholarly publications. In some cases, articles can be retracted from journals; however, this outcome is rare. I set out to find if any OpenSees articles, i.e., articles that refer to OpenSees, have been retracted. Google Scholar is usually a good place … Continue reading OpenSees Retractions

OpenSees Bean Counting

Based on review invitations, new paper announcements on social media, and Google Scholar citation alerts, I've seen a lot of OpenSees-based journal articles. I'm sure you have as well. With a few exceptions, the journals that house OpenSees-based articles have been the usual suspects in earthquake engineering. But recently, it's felt like the distribution of … Continue reading OpenSees Bean Counting

With or Without You

Citation-based metrics are like lottery tickets--they are not for investment purposes and should be used for entertainment only. Unfortunately, some promotion and tenure evaluators treat citation-based metrics like investment decisions. To aid in evaluation, citation-based metrics are readily available online, ranging from Web of Science, which indexes only archival publications, to Google Scholar, which indexes … Continue reading With or Without You

How to Cite OpenSees

In the $latex R^{42}$ space that defines academic performance evaluation, citation-based metrics comprise a small but often over-emphasized subspace. Based on the developers' Google Scholar profiles, it is clear that OpenSees generates a lot of citations from various corners of cyberspace. In the citation-stingy field of structural engineering, the numbers are impressive. On the other … Continue reading How to Cite OpenSees